1600 Farnam
Moderators: Coyote, nebugeater, Brad, Omaha Cowboy, BRoss
-
- Human Relations
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 6:14 am
1600 Farnam
Current renters have been informed that the building is going condo. Â They will be allowed to stay through the end of their leases. Â Those currently living there will be givin incentives should they like to buy a condo in the building. Â (closing cost paid..etc..)
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
I'm assuming the units will remain virtually the same...they will just be owned in stead of rented. Anyway, I hope these are affordable.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
I had a freind who lived in a one bedroom unit in the building a couple years back and it was fairly small but nice. They didn't have in unit washers and dryer though I don't believe. The ceilings were tall and the finished weren't too bad from what I remember. Does anyone know if there are larger two bedroom or more units in the building. Another positive is the attached parking garage.
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:43 am
- Contact:
All of the marketing material will be in place and a sales office and 2 models will be available for viewing by mid-April. If you would like to be contacted when sales begin please e-mail me at tasha@UrbanOmaha.com.
Tasha... what are you guys doing with these units (the Hill, 1600 Farnam, Regis, etc)... to prepare them for 'life as a condominium' ? We're so used to seeing projects like Paxton, Beebe & Runyan, etc... go through substantial renovations, takings months... if not years. Are the buildings you're representing nearly ready for market before you get to them? Or is alot being done to bring them up to a level commensurate with their respective sales prices?
-
- City Council
- Posts: 6865
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:46 pm
Considering that they're going to be offering models, I would assume that they'll be "updating" the units a bit as far as kitchen amenities and quality of fixtures, etc. But hopefully Tasha can answer those questions for us.
I think it's great that so many new and converted condos are appearing downtown. The more PERMANENT residents downtown, the better. It helps give downtown the appeal of having neighborhoods and of being a stable place to live, not solely for "transient" people, who will only stay for a few years at the most. Of course there will always be a market for that, but it's nice that we're getting diverse options.
I think it's great that so many new and converted condos are appearing downtown. The more PERMANENT residents downtown, the better. It helps give downtown the appeal of having neighborhoods and of being a stable place to live, not solely for "transient" people, who will only stay for a few years at the most. Of course there will always be a market for that, but it's nice that we're getting diverse options.
"The right to have access to every building in the city by private motorcar in an age when everyone possesses such a vehicle is actually the right to destroy the city."
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
Lewis Mumford, The Highway and the City, 1963
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:43 am
- Contact:
New construction is a lot more time consuming than a conversion from apartment to condo. That is why you see it taking months and years for some of the projects. The apartment buildings we are converting are essentially ready to go except for some cosmetic changes.
I will be able to offer more details to everyone at a later date. Right now our first concern is to make sure all of the tenants understand everything that is going on before the rest of Omaha does.
I will be able to offer more details to everyone at a later date. Right now our first concern is to make sure all of the tenants understand everything that is going on before the rest of Omaha does.
I'd hate to see to many people get priced out of DT. Even if they are more affordable not everyone can get a condo. People around my age who want to live DT need to be able to find nice apartments. We're not going to live their forever but we need more younger people down there. Do you really want the area full of old West O empty Nesters? Not everyone will be like that but I still want to see residences DT in all price ranges.
DTO
-
- Human Relations
- Posts: 595
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 6:12 pm
- Location: Omaha, someplace in middle America
- Coyote
- City Council
- Posts: 33197
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:18 am
- Location: Aksarben Village
- Contact:
OWH wrote: 6 Farnam 1600 building tenants fight condo switch
Six tenants of downtown's Farnam 1600 building won a temporary restraining order Friday preventing the owners from proceeding with plans to convert 81 units to condominiums.
A hearing will be held, probably next week, to consider a temporary injunction.
That effort will be fought, said Larry Jobeun, the Omaha attorney representing the building owner, a Minnesota corporation.
The company's real estate agents notified tenants about a month ago about opportunities to buy their units, setting off complaints about the prices, from $60,000 to more than $200,000.
Roger Holthaus, an attorney with an office and a residence in the building at 16th and Farnam Streets, filed on behalf of six residents.
He said residents were given an April 3 deadline for entering into contracts but have yet to see a public offering statement.
The statement, he said, is all residents will have to rely on because Nebraska's "outdated" condo conversion law doesn't provide for independent inspections.
Jobeun said the statement is still being prepared and, by law, residents will have 60 days after receiving the statement before their unit can be offered to anyone else. All leases, he added, are being honored. Jobeun said the April 3 date referred only to the time to take advantage of discount prices.
"We fully intend to comply with the law," he said
-
- Home Owners Association
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 8:16 pm
- Location: Omaha, NE
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:43 am
- Contact:
Farnam 1600 will be turned condo regardless of this temporary restraining order. These are people who are being misled by a lawyer that is using this issue to get more exposure for himself. If the government has the authority to stop anyone from selling their property then we have a lot more to worry about than how many apartment buildings there are downtown.
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:43 am
- Contact:
OWH Article:
JUDGE CLEARS FARNAM 1600 FOR CONDOS
Owners of downtown's Farnam 1600 building can proceed with plans to convert 81 units into condominiums, a Douglas County District Court judge ruled Thursday.
Judge James Gleason said that based on the "paucity" of evidence presented that residents would suffer harm, he could not order a preliminary injunction.
He lifted the temporary restraining order won Friday by six tenants.
Thursday's hearing focused on tenants' motions for a preliminary injunction and to allow them to hire an independent inspector.
Roger Holthaus, the tenants' attorney, said they were given an April 3 deadline for entering purchase contracts, but have yet to see a public offering statement on the building's condition.
That statement, he said, will include results of inspectors hired by the owners, and tenants want an independent inspection.
Greg Scaglione, an attorney representing the owners, said residents are free to have inspections of their individual units and to negotiate as part of a contract further inspections.
He said the owners are doing what state law requires and were "very ambitious" in their efforts over the past month to gather expert information for the public offering statement.
"We are holding none of the tenants to the April 3 deadline," he said.
The company's real estate agents notified tenants about a month ago about opportunities to buy their units, prompting complaints about the prices, from $60,000 to more than $200,000. The agents said all leases would be honored. They set an April 3 deadline for taking advantage of discount prices.
Brian Pellowski, who represented the owners, said after the hearing that phase one of the inspections had revealed no issues with radon, asbestos or lead-based paint. Owners are awaiting another report before compiling the public offering statement, he said.
Holthaus, who has a residence and law office in the building, and some other tenants expressed disappointment with the court ruling and a desire for better communication.
Pete Wetzel said the hearing was the first time he heard that the April 3 deadline was waived.
"A lot of people refer to apartments or condos," he said. "We refer to them as our homes."
JUDGE CLEARS FARNAM 1600 FOR CONDOS
Owners of downtown's Farnam 1600 building can proceed with plans to convert 81 units into condominiums, a Douglas County District Court judge ruled Thursday.
Judge James Gleason said that based on the "paucity" of evidence presented that residents would suffer harm, he could not order a preliminary injunction.
He lifted the temporary restraining order won Friday by six tenants.
Thursday's hearing focused on tenants' motions for a preliminary injunction and to allow them to hire an independent inspector.
Roger Holthaus, the tenants' attorney, said they were given an April 3 deadline for entering purchase contracts, but have yet to see a public offering statement on the building's condition.
That statement, he said, will include results of inspectors hired by the owners, and tenants want an independent inspection.
Greg Scaglione, an attorney representing the owners, said residents are free to have inspections of their individual units and to negotiate as part of a contract further inspections.
He said the owners are doing what state law requires and were "very ambitious" in their efforts over the past month to gather expert information for the public offering statement.
"We are holding none of the tenants to the April 3 deadline," he said.
The company's real estate agents notified tenants about a month ago about opportunities to buy their units, prompting complaints about the prices, from $60,000 to more than $200,000. The agents said all leases would be honored. They set an April 3 deadline for taking advantage of discount prices.
Brian Pellowski, who represented the owners, said after the hearing that phase one of the inspections had revealed no issues with radon, asbestos or lead-based paint. Owners are awaiting another report before compiling the public offering statement, he said.
Holthaus, who has a residence and law office in the building, and some other tenants expressed disappointment with the court ruling and a desire for better communication.
Pete Wetzel said the hearing was the first time he heard that the April 3 deadline was waived.
"A lot of people refer to apartments or condos," he said. "We refer to them as our homes."
-
- New to the Neighborhood
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 11:43 am
- Contact:
-
- City Council
- Posts: 105451
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:34 pm
- Location: Somewhere between downtown and Colorado
- Contact:
1600 Farnam
I am considering a unit there on one of the top 2 floors, facing west (above the Regis though). Â What are your thoughts on this building, location, price range, etc. Â I really dislike the street hoodlums and bums out front but like the units. Â I would likely be there for 2 yrs minimum and maybe more. Â I work out near Regency. Â Am I making a mistake by getting something in Farnam given my job and uncertainty with time commitment? Â I am just concerned I might struggle selling something like this in this building in the short term if I had to??
This decision is driving me crazy!
This decision is driving me crazy!
It has good views, and a Central location.
Here is our previous discussion:
http://eomahaforums.com/phpBB/viewtopic ... 600+farnam
Here is our previous discussion:
http://eomahaforums.com/phpBB/viewtopic ... 600+farnam
Omaha Skyline Photos, Omaha Aerial Photos, and More.
Website: www.bradwilliamsphotography.com
Facebook: www.facebook.com/bradwilliamsphotography
Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradwphoto
Instagram: www.instagram.com/bradwilliamsphotography
YouTube: www.youtube.com/@bradwilliamsphoto
From what I'm seeing from your post is that your biggest concern is resale time when you decide to move. If priced appropriately and done right, this shouldn't be a problem. Are the units already upgraded or still in the original state? I've showed them to a few of my of clients recently and they really liked them as well. Also, there is a PROPOSED streetcar line that will go down 16th St. adding much value to the area (can't find the link to the streetcar newsletter).
Although I don't have a good feel of your situation or all your concerns, I would have to say go with your gut. Your natural instinct is usually correct. If you want to talk more or whatever please PM or email me at avanzee@npdodge.com. Hope I helped.
Although I don't have a good feel of your situation or all your concerns, I would have to say go with your gut. Your natural instinct is usually correct. If you want to talk more or whatever please PM or email me at avanzee@npdodge.com. Hope I helped.
Adam186,
My 2 biggest concerns are that I'll take it in the shorts if I decide to sell in 2 yrs or so AND that I will regret buying a place downtown when I work around 100th & Dodge will probably spend plenty of time west of there. Â Coming from Minneapolis where I work downtown, I have grown to appreciate the downtown condo and character of areas like the old market.....
As for the unit. Â 13th floor 1br 750 sq ft. Â It will be updated with wood (real) floors, tiled bathroom floor, new bedroom carpet, stainless steel appliances, painted the colors of my choice, and possibly granite or granite tile counter tops. Â I will also own the parking stall. Â $135k-ish. Â The unit was assessed at $154k. Â Which has me wondering if it will be that much harder to sell as a west facing unit?
Any thoughts are appreciated. Â I love hearing others opinions on this!
My 2 biggest concerns are that I'll take it in the shorts if I decide to sell in 2 yrs or so AND that I will regret buying a place downtown when I work around 100th & Dodge will probably spend plenty of time west of there. Â Coming from Minneapolis where I work downtown, I have grown to appreciate the downtown condo and character of areas like the old market.....
As for the unit. Â 13th floor 1br 750 sq ft. Â It will be updated with wood (real) floors, tiled bathroom floor, new bedroom carpet, stainless steel appliances, painted the colors of my choice, and possibly granite or granite tile counter tops. Â I will also own the parking stall. Â $135k-ish. Â The unit was assessed at $154k. Â Which has me wondering if it will be that much harder to sell as a west facing unit?
Any thoughts are appreciated. Â I love hearing others opinions on this!
Glad to see you made your way over to this site.
I don't think a west facing unit would have a problem with resale. 1600 is not a bad place to be in at all. The streetcars running in front of the building will be a great boost to your resale. Also new residential, retail, and dining options are moving closer to 16th St. Look no further than the Paxton block and how it was a vacant building 2 years ago, to a true DT success story. New high-end condos, 3 new restaurants, a nightclub, a lounge, tanning salon, and bank branch location. The Barker building on 15th will see the same treatment in the next few years which will bode well for 1600 Farnam.
In the coming years that unit would be great for resale to someone working Downtown. I know a couple of people from out of town that have gotten jobs with First National or UP and they've have looked at 1600 Farnam as a place to live. I know there are already quite a few FNB employees who live in 1600.
Now as far as where you will spend your time, that's totally up to you. If you're already used to a DT environment than 1600 will be great for you. Yes it does suck that some homeless and vagrants like to congregate along 16th St. but that will change as more people move in and frequent the area keeping the vagrants out.
I don't think a west facing unit would have a problem with resale. 1600 is not a bad place to be in at all. The streetcars running in front of the building will be a great boost to your resale. Also new residential, retail, and dining options are moving closer to 16th St. Look no further than the Paxton block and how it was a vacant building 2 years ago, to a true DT success story. New high-end condos, 3 new restaurants, a nightclub, a lounge, tanning salon, and bank branch location. The Barker building on 15th will see the same treatment in the next few years which will bode well for 1600 Farnam.
In the coming years that unit would be great for resale to someone working Downtown. I know a couple of people from out of town that have gotten jobs with First National or UP and they've have looked at 1600 Farnam as a place to live. I know there are already quite a few FNB employees who live in 1600.
Now as far as where you will spend your time, that's totally up to you. If you're already used to a DT environment than 1600 will be great for you. Yes it does suck that some homeless and vagrants like to congregate along 16th St. but that will change as more people move in and frequent the area keeping the vagrants out.
DTO